Five training stages, same task, 500 samples each. The reliability diagram plots stated confidence (x-axis) against empirical accuracy in that confidence bin (y-axis). Perfect calibration lies on the diagonal. Watch what happens through the training pipeline: base models are roughly calibrated; SFT shifts confidence up slightly; RLHF cranks confidence to the ceiling regardless of actual correctness; temperature scaling pulls it back; verbal hedging fixes it differently. ECE quantifies the gap. The visceral lesson: if you trust an RLHF model's reported confidence, you're trusting the wrong number.